"The best part – and the only part – of a novel that gives unalloyed pleasure is the idea. That descends in three seconds usually. I always say that the difference between this stage and delivering a finished book is similar to the difference between having an orgasm and having a baby. Perhaps this is why so many people talk about writing, and not so many can deliver a finished manuscript."
-Michelle Lovric
What makes this book so fascinating is, of course the title. Call me shallow but I do tend to judge a book by its cover. I eye the title and the cover design, then I seek out the synopsis at the back, weighing the worthiness of reading what the author has to say.
And it's tough when you are reading a book by someone you never read before. But I'm glad I did.
What's Good
Michelle chose to write from several characters' point of views. Namely, the villains, Minguillo Fasan and Sor Loreta; Marcella Fasan (the sister), Dr Santo Albobrandin (the hero, well, sort of) and Gianni (the manservant). I use the phrase "villain" loosely here because both Minguillo and Loreta didn't stand a chance to be anything else but be evil/bad.
But I digress.
Why this format works is because it allows the reader to form a relationship with each of the five central characters. I can't tell how many times I want to whack Gianni on the head when I disagree with his actions, cringe at Minguillo's terrible acts against his sister and eerily drawn to the reality Sor Loreta painted for herself.
I'm a sucker for descriptive words and so Michelle drew me in with the semi-historical landscape of Venice and Peru. I can imagine the look and the smell of each character; the vivid colours of the convent and the horror that lies in wait for Marcella.
There are many lessons one can draw from Sor Loreta and Minguillo, more so than the "good" guys. Which is not to say they are not interesting, but Michelle has created such interesting villains with so much dimension and flaw, they have this push-pull factor for me.
What's Bad
I understand the need for realism but the crappy spelling for Gianni's character is just too much. Half the time I'm trying to decipher what he's trying to say and the phonetic spelling for 80% of the words is just exhausting. Trivial? I think not! When you are depending on what the character is saying to get to the meat of the story, you better know what the story teller is saying!
The way the story ends is satisfactory. I don't exactly hate it but there are one or two issues that Michelle touched on but never really explore. Like Marcella trying to figure out why Minguillo hates her so much. I figured she wants to leave it open ended but this is purely nit picking on my part.
All in all, a beautiful/scary story (I can imagine this turning into a screenplay), but I'm not exactly jumping out of my seat salivating for more of Michelle's books. That's not to say it wasn't a good book, but to me, it's just didn't have that wow factor.
I suppose part of the reason is the slow pace. So many things are happening in the book, but it doesn't feel that way. That's the weakness of second hand account storytelling. When someone is telling you the bomb exploded, it's not as exciting as reading right off the bat that the bomb did explode.
The Verdict
I don't hate the story but for me, it's not one of those books that fall under the "Books you must read before you die".